Отечественная история

The Article is dedicated to unknown page to histories of the lawsuit on sailor – a participant of Sevastopol rebellion of 1905. In article is analysed tactics of protection defendant sailor, organizer and leader which has been the leader to synergies «Molodaya Advokatura» N.K. Muraviev. At emphases of the author concentrated on original acceptance of protection, for the first time aplying Muraviev’evym and his colleague.

Статья посвящена малоизученной странице истории судебного процесса над матросами – участниками Севастопольского восстания 1905 г. В статье анализируется тактика защиты подсудимых матросов, организатором и руководителем которой выступил лидер синергии «молодая адвокатура» Н. К. Муравьев. При этом особое внимание автора сосредоточено на оригинальном приеме защиты, впервые примененном Муравьевым и его коллегами.

The social and economic situation in the black-soil region of Russia at the times of World War I is the main object of the article. The author analyses the activities of the central and local administrations, especially their efforts to protect internal markets of consumer goods. The article shows that the Russian peasantry produced sufficient quantities of grain and could supply army and industrial centers. The political stability was ruined because of concrete mistakes of imperial and local authorities. 

In the article the role of the institutions of zemsky government in the formation of the civil society in Russia in the second half of the XIX th century is discussed. The participation of representatives of various classes of society in the work of zemstvo, appointment of the members of the zemstvo by election and the possibility to show the initiative in solving social problems allowed zemstvo to become the core of the developing civil society.

The article focuses on the issue of the Russian society attitude to the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, its reflection in the memoirs literature. The author brings to light three viewpoints on the tasks the Russian Empire has been facing then. The views of V.P. Mescherskii, D.I. Ilovayskii, G.K. Gradovskii and K.I. Voronitch are represented in the article.

In the article the method of historical-semantic analysis in used. Natural language is understood as a sign system of public consciousness. The change of the meaning of the conception «liberalism» in Russian public consciousness of 1855–1858 under the influence of social practices and political processes, which proceeded in Russia, is shown.

The report considers the role and impottance of russian advocature in the second half of the 20th century. The author analyses process of struggle of russian and advocators with the authorities for their existence also models of Russian and foreing advocature are compared.

The article analyzes statistics, closed for many decades for an ordinary user, on the budgets of families of peasant collective farmers in 1958. Comparing with the indicators of the period of the beginning of agrarian reforms, we can conclude that the position of the collective farm peasantry has improved somewhat due to the reduction of taxes and fees. At the same time, cash and natural income were small, the structure of expenses did not undergo significant changes.

The paper examines the process of evacuation of industrial facilities and civilian population to the territory of the Kemerovo region – Kuzbass during the Great Patriotic War. The author provides information on the number of evacuated enterprises, and also clarifies their locations before and after the relocation. The largest industrial facilities in Kuzbass are highlighted, which were created even before the start of the war and were industrial sites for the commissioning of equipment from arriving factories.

The article considers the activities of the authorities in the direction of finding an acceptable model for the organization of control in a Soviet-type society. Based on archival sources, methods and technologies related to the involvement of workers to the work of the Workers’ and Peasants’ Inspectorate and the construction of the entire system of functioning of control departments are analyzed.