Izvestiya of Saratov University.

History. International Relations

ISSN 1819-4907 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1913 (Online)

For citation:

Tsibenko V. V. The International aspect of Circassian Involvement to the Young Turk movement in the 19th century. Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 350-355. DOI: 10.18500/1819-4907-2022-22-3-350-355

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 88)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Международные отношения
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[[94+329.17](560)(=352.3):327(410)]|18|
DOI: 
10.18500/1819-4907-2022-22-3-350-355

The International aspect of Circassian Involvement to the Young Turk movement in the 19th century

Autors: 
Tsibenko Veronika V., Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities (Southern Federal University)
Abstract: 

The author traces the role of North Caucasian emigrants (Circassians) in the Young Turk movement. For a long time, since the 19th century, Circassian question have maintained high political importance on the international agenda, turning Circassians and their projected North Caucasian state into a proto-subject of international relations. The main support for such subjectivisation was provided by Great Britain, but uptothe end ofthe 19th century Circassian issues had lost much of its importance for the British Empire. This context allows us to take a fresh look at the little-studied topic of participation of Circassians in the Young Turk movement, one of the main centres of which was Egypt under British control.

Key words: 
Ottoman Empire
Young Turks
Circassians
Caucasus
Committee of Union and Progress
NATIONALISM
Reference: 
  1. Demiraр Y. Pan-Ideologies in The Ottoman Empire Against the West : From Pan-Ottomanism to Pan-Turkism // The Turkish Yearbook. 2005. Vol. 36. Р. 139–158.
  2. Киреев Н. Г. История Турции. XX в. М. : ИВ РАН, Крафт+, 2007. 608 с.
  3. Еремеев Д. Е., Мейер М. С. История Турции в средние века и новое время. М. : Издательство МГУ, 1992. 248 с. 
  4. Papers Respecting the Settlement of Circassian Emigrants in Turkey. Presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty, in pursuance of their Address dated June 6, 1864. London : Harrison and Sons, 1864. 11 p.
  5. McCarthy J. Population History of the Middle East and the Balkans. Istanbul : Isis, 2010. 323 p.
  6. Karpat K. H. Ottoman Population 1830–1914. Demographic and Social Characteristics. Wisconsin : University of Wisconsin, 1985. 242 p.
  7. Tsibenko V. V., Tsibenko S. N. Circassian Question : Transformation of Content and Perception // Bylye Gody. 2015. Vol. 36, iss. 2. Р. 450–460.
  8. Авакян А. Г. Черкесы в системе государственной власти Османской империи и Турции (вторая половина XIX – первая четверть XX вв. : дис. … д-ра ист. наук. М., 2002. 224 с.
  9. Berzeg S. Türkiye Kurtuluş Savaşında Çerkes Göçmenleri II. İstanbul : Nart Yayıncılık, 1990. 99 s.
  10. Aydemir İ. Muhaceretteki Çerkes Aydınları. Ankara : s.p., 1991. 243 s.
  11. Carman H. J. England and the Egyptian Problem // Political Science Quarterly. 1921. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 51–78.
  12. Gündüz M. Educational Books Published by Young Turks in Egypt (1890–1908) // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010. Vol. 9. P. 1090–1095.
  13. Loiseau J. Soldiers Diaspora or Cairene Nobility? The Circassians in the Mamluk Sultanate // Union in Separation. Diasporic Groups and Identities in the Eastern Mediterranean (1100–1800) / еd. by G. Christ, F. Morche, R. Zaugg, W. Kaiser, S. Burkhardt, A. D. Beihammer. Rome : Viella, 2015. P. 207–217. 
  14. Макеев Д. А. Проблемы формирования и политической активности интеллигенции Египта во время оккупационного режима (до 1901 г.) // Вестник Владимирского государственного университета. Серия : Социальные и гуманитарные науки. 2014. № 3 (3). С. 16–29.
  15. Kayali H. Arabs and Young Turks : Ottomanism, Arabism, and Islamism in the Ottoman Empire, 1908–1918. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1997. 291 р.
  16. Şahin E. Londra’da II. Abdülhamid’e Muhalif Bir Yayın : Civanpir’in Hürriyet’i // Journal of Turkish Studies. 2019. Vol. 52. P. 185–206.
  17. Karaoğlu Ö. Osmanli İktisat ve Maliyesi’ne Yerli Bir Yaklaşım Örneği : Mizan Gazetesi // Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2013. Cilt VIII, Sayı II. S. 191–206.
  18. Ercoєkun T. Ahmed Saib ve Sancak Gazetesi // Kebikeç. 2008. № 26. S. 97–150.
  19. Hanioğlu M. Ş. The Young Turks in Opposition. Studies in Middle Eastern History. New York : Oxford University Press, 1995. 390 p.
  20. Чочиев Г. В. «Общество единения черкесов» и его печатный орган – газета «Иттихад» (Каир, 1899 г.) // Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 13 : Востоковедение и африканистика. 2011. Вып. 3. С. 52–62.
  21. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi Dahiliye Nezareti Mektubi Kalemi (BOA. DH.MKT) 2258.65.
  22. Özkan K. Mütareke Döneminde “Milliyet” Ve “Anâsır” Kavramı Üzerine Tartışmalar // Belgi Dergisi. Yaz 2018/I. Sy. 15. S. 694–727
Received: 
06.03.2022
Accepted: 
12.04.2022
Published: 
30.09.2022