Izvestiya of Saratov University.

History. International Relations

ISSN 1819-4907 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1913 (Online)


For citation:

Dementyeva V. V. Historical Memory of Romans as an Object of Modern Studies of Antiquity (new papers on pompa funebris and imagines maiorum). Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, 2009, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 36-43.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 14)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
930.1(09) (37+38)

Historical Memory of Romans as an Object of Modern Studies of Antiquity (new papers on pompa funebris and imagines maiorum)

Autors: 
Abstract: 

Studying the problem of memoria and res publica in a modern historiography includes the investigation of a funeral procession. In the works analysed in this article historians differently consider the priority of functions of historical memory in respect to pompa funebris: K.-I. Hölkeskamp singles out the communicative one, E. Flaig – the proving one, and U. Walter – both of them. E. Flaig’s pays more attention comparing with the other authors to the educational function as well. The conclusion that the reconstruction of realities of the past was accurate during pompa funebris is well-reasoned by the researchers thus contributing to the rehabilitation of historical memory of Romans as a whole, including indirectly, by opinion of the author of this article, the rehabilitation of Roman works on history. The substantiation by researchers of antiquity of the absence of falsifications in laudationes helps to soften the negative perception of reliability of the information in elogia, having the graveside orations among other primary sources.

Reference: 
  1. Flaig E. Ritualisierte Politik. Zeichen, Gesten und herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen, 2003. S. 49–68; Hölkeskamp K.‑I. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik. Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart, 2004. S. 188–190; Walter U. Memoria und res publica. Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt am Main, München, 2004; Idem. „Ein Ebenbild des Vaters“. Familiale Wiederhohlung in der Historiographischen Traditionsbildung der Römischen Republik // Hermes. 2004. Bd. 132. S. 406–425; Idem. Ahn macht Sinn. Familientradition und Familienprofil im republikanischen Rom // Sinn (in) der Antike. Orientirungssysteme, Leitbilder und Wertkonzepte im Altertum. Mainz am Rhein, 2003. S. 255–278.
  2. Flaig E. Op. cit. S. 49–68.
  3. Дементьева В.В. Римская Республика: институциональная история и семиология // Политика. Идеология. Культура. Проблемы всемирной истории: Сб. науч. тр. Ярославль: ЯрГУ, 2006. С. 3–11.
  4. Schneider K. Imagines maiorum // RE. Sp. 1098.
  5. Latte K. Römische Religionsgeschichte. München, 1960. S. 100.
  6. Kierdorf W. Laudatio funebris. Interpretationen und untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan, 1980. S. 79.
  7. Штербенк-Эркер Д. Оплакивание покойника в Риме: материал к анализу роли женщины в римском трауре // Древнее Средиземноморье: религия, общество, культура: Сб. статей / Под ред. О.П. Смирновой, А.Л. Смышляева. М.:ИВИ РАН, 2005. С. 180.
  8. Dupont F. Les monsters de Seneque. Pour une dramaturgie de la tragedie romaine. Paris, 1994.
  9. Hölkeskamp K.‑I. Op. cit. S. 188–190.
  10.  Ibid. S. 189.
  11. Ассман Я. Культурная память: Письма, память о прошлом и политическая идентичность в высоких культурах древности / Пер. с нем. М.М. Сокольской. М., 2004. С. 65.
  12. Там же. С. 83–84.
Received: 
10.03.2009
Accepted: 
10.04.2009
Published: 
27.04.2009
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 15)