Izvestiya of Saratov University.

History. International Relations

ISSN 1819-4907 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1913 (Online)

For citation:

Yakubova L. А. The Lisbon Strategy of 2000 Implementation and the Formation of a Unified Model of the European Union’s Social Policy. Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 223-231. DOI: 10.18500/1819-4907-2018-18-2-223-231

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 120)
Article type: 

The Lisbon Strategy of 2000 Implementation and the Formation of a Unified Model of the European Union’s Social Policy

Yakubova Lala А., Nizhnevartovsk State University

The European Union’s social policy is the subject of a large number of studies; it is an important area of domestic policy for each EU member state and their citizens. The formation of the EU general social policy passed certain stages in its historical development. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems that arise in the formation of the EU unified social policy in the context of its development. This article explores the specific features of the European Union’s social and political integration in the 2000s within the framework of the Lisbon Strategy and the unified social policy creation. Presents an analysis of one of the ways to coordinate the European Union social policy – Open method of coordination; comments on its structure, implementation and improvement.


1. Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March, 2000, Presidency Conclusions. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (дата обращения: 15.10.2017).

2. EUROPE 2020 : A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/ec-understanding-era-13.pdf (дата обращения:15.10.2017).

3. Boeri T. Social Policy : One for All? // Croatian Journal of Social Policy. 2005. Vol. 12, № 3–4.

4. Sand I. J. Understanding the New Forms of Governance : Mutually Interdependent, Reflexive, Destabilized and Competing Institutions // Europ. Law J. 1998. № 4 (3). Р. 271-293 ; Teague P. Deliberative Governance and EU social policy // Europ. J. for the Industr. Rel. 2001. № 7. Р. 7-26.

5. Tapio R. Does EMC really benefit national parliaments? // Europ. Law J. 2006. Vol. 12, № 1. Р. 130-131.

6. Ekengren M., Jacobsson K. Explaining of Constitutionalization of EU Governance - the Case ofEuropean employment cooperation // SCORE Reserarch Report. 2000. Vol. 8. Р. 7-10 ; Scot J., Trubeck D. M. Mind the gap : Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union // Europ. Law J. 2002. № 8 (1). Р. 1-18.

7. Featherstone K. «Soft" co-ordination meets "hard" politics : the European Union and pension reform in Greece // J. of Europ. Publ. Policy. 2005. Vol. 12, № 4. Р. 733-750.

8. Lopez-Santana M. The domestic implications of European soft law: framing and transmitting change in employment policy // J. of Europ. Publ. Policy. 2006. Vol. 13, № 4. Р. 481-499.

9. Zeitlin J., Pochet P., Magnusson L. The Open Method of Coordination in Action : The Employment European and Social Inclusion Strategies. PIE-Peter Lang, Brussels, 2005.

10. Szyszczak E. Experimental Governance : The Open Method of Coordination // Europ. Law J. 2006. Vol. 12, № 4, July. Р. 486-502.

11. Working Together, Working Better : A New Framework for the Open Coordination of Social Protection and Inclusion in the European Union. Brussels, 22.12.2005 // COM. 2005. 706 Final. Dec. 22.